Doug Wilson Church Splitter
Posted: November 22, 2006 Filed under: CREC, Doug Wilson 19 CommentsConfederation of Reformed Evangelical Churches member Church Of The King in Santa Cruz, California has bailed out of the CREC.
COTK posted a revised version of an earlier announcement, apparently out of diplomatic concerns for it’s relations with other CREC member churches and ministers. But one of the problems with the internet is that once you post something it can sometimes be hard to take it back.
An original copy of the COTK Elders’ letter can be found here: For The Record: Our Withdrawal From The CREC
Doug Wilson’s popish behavior is entirely responsible for the departure of Pastor Andrew Sandlin’s church from the CREC. Wilson meddled and interfered in the internal affairs of Sandlin’s church. Wilson’s duplicitous and divisive behavior is reprehensible. Could it get any more despicable than for a Moderator to interpose himself in local church matters and actively encourage a church split?
Doug Wilson’s motives, as articulated in the COTK Elders’ letter, are clear — his theological disagreements with Andrew Sandlin. To think that Doug Wilson would meddle and effectively sabotage Andrew Sandlin’s church over their differences of opinion on Federal Vision and other doctrines only proves what Doug Wilson is made of:
“At one point Rev. Wilson communicated to us that the main issue of this entire dispute was his personal differences with one of our elders, P. Andrew Sandlin. Though Revs. Sandlin and Wilson do maintain certain theological disagreements, these disagreements were tangent to the actual church issues under consideration. Nevertheless, when Rev. Sandlin offered to meet Rev. Wilson privately to address any differences these highly visible men might have, Rev. Wilson declined to take him up on the offer.”
The CREC Constitution gives Wilson, as the Moderator of Anselm Presbytery (why they call it a “Presbytery” when it’s obvious that the CREC isn’t Presbyterian at all is unclear) no authority to interpose himself in a local church dispute. Yet he did so anyway, uninvited and unwelcomed. As the COTK elders state:
“By these actions it has now become apparent that the CREC, in conflict with its constitution, has become functionally Episcopal, coalescing around Rev. Wilson as the sole denominational bishop vested with sweeping judicial and prelatical authority.”
Not that I’m in any way surprised that Doug Wilson has broken his vows to obey the CREC’s Constitution. In fact vow breaking is entirely consistent with how Wilson operates, and he’s very comfortable welcoming into the ranks of the CREC fellow vow breaking ministers who play fast and loose with the rules, including even the defrocked. Witness RC Sproul Jr.
Men of Doug Wilson’s ilk when given any authority at all will always attempt to seize more authority, whether their constitution that they have sworn to obey grants them that authority or not. The inevitable result is a church split:
“As it stands now, Rev. Wilson has determined to start a congregation from a church split, a split that his actions repeatedly encouraged. The Anselm presbytery has at this late date retroactively sanctioned his injurious actions. This is the same split-group congregation that Rev. Wilson has all along insisted we agree with him in recognizing, and he has finally gotten his way in starting it as a CREC church. The end was visible from the beginning.”
Doug Wilson is an autonomist who plays by his own set of rules. He was instrumental in forming the CREC and drafting its constitution, a constitution which he feels no sense of obligation to obey himself. This is the very definition of a tyrant — a man who seeks to hold everyone else accountable but who for all practical purposes is accountable to no one but himself.
Doug Wilson is first and foremost a very crafty politician and so he sets up a church infrastructure which, to the untrained eye, gives the appearance of officialdom and accountability. In reality however the accountability infrastructure is a sham that a crafty guy like Doug Wilson can easily avoid at every turn. Sadly for Rev. Sandlin and Church Of The King they found that out too late that they’d been hoodwinked:
“We cannot remain in an organization that acts so radically at variance with its own constituting documents. Ironically, the CREC constitution provides for expulsion of a member church on the grounds of dishonest theological subscription, but there seems to be no constitutional recourse when the CREC leadership is guilty of dishonest subscription to its own constitution.”
I want to personally wish all the members of Church Of The King a joyous Thanksgiving. It’s no doubt been a difficult year for you. But you now have much to be grateful for. You’ve separated yourselves from a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
Frank, I notice a few differences between the original version (Google cache) and the “official” version. Naming names now, we see that Rev. Chris Schlect was the one who complained that the CREC constitution’s view of the role of moderator is “a real problem.” He outlines instead a much more active, intrusive role for the moderator, stating: “The direction we [the CREC?] are moving calls for more than this,” i.e., more authority than the constitutionally limited role of moderator. The CREC constitution forbids that the moderator may exercise judicial authority; Rev. Schlect dislikes this limitation and wants it abolished, and calls the CREC to “modify our constitution” to grant the moderator (he explicitly desires the moniker bishop”) more intrusive authority within churches. He wants the moderator to be “the personal embodiment of the CRE[C],” and he holds up as a positive example the Roman Catholic Pope at this point… A CREC moderator (bishop) is now operating as Rev. Schlect wants him to act just such a “bishop,” but in so doing, he has acted contrary to the CREC constitution.
So, the CREC has a pope now, does it? Oh, they can call him a bishop or whatever moniker they like, but Doug Wilson’s new position of authority in the CREC is like that of the pope. Aren’t these churches ones that are in favor of the Reformation? Does history really need to repeat itself again? I pray that the churches in the CREC open their spiritual eyes and leave while the getting is still good!
[…] the Wood are very thankful. Posted by Michael Metzler on Wednesday, November 22, 2006, at 5:06 pm. Print This Post | EMail This Post « previous post Pooh’s Think is powered byWordPress. […]
[…] the Wood are very thankful. Posted by Michael Metzler on Wednesday, November 22, 2006, at 5:06 pm. Print This Post | EMail This Post « previous post Pooh’s Think is powered byWordPress. […]
Jen,
You Write: “…I pray that the churches in the CREC open their spiritual eyes and leave while the getting is still good!”
I wish it was that simple; it should be that simple. But at least in this case it seems to be a lot more complicated: After being “in it” here in Moscow for so long, I can testify to Wilson’s amazingly persistent and shrewd covering of his ambitions. Wilson is very patient, very good with rhetoric, and is willing to say anything to keep rhetorical domination at all times. He also does very well at using pious, religious language and gospel doxologies, even though the content of this gospel language has very little to do with his actual techniques and social goals; often, they are diametrically opposed. For instance, his thuggish, aggressive, and belittling approach to local “apologetics” and the “culture war” are at this point notorious. And yet after engaging in fresh antics he will immediately go to typing up an exhortation about how Christians are to evangelize through humble, silent, peaceful, and charitable living in a community. Is it really that insane? Yes, it is really that insane, as many people, Christians and non-Christians, have been pointing out for years. Wilson is also good at switching from sophisticated college instructor to fundamentalist preacher at the drop of a hat, which is consistent with his bashing of contemporary establishments until they give him some recognition. More could be said; I think worse could be said. But I’m trying to keep my comments here ginger enough for those new to this situation.
Michael Metzler
http://www.poohsthink.com
Thanks, Michael. Actually, I’ve followed most of what you’ve written about Doug Wilson, as I would think many others in the CREC churches have as well. Finding your logic usually well thought out, and seeing in writing the rants and raves of this new “Pope,” which you so adeptly refute line by line, I really don’t see the draw to such a man. He must have a very charismatic personality, which is all the more reason to stay far away from this group of churches! Keep up the good work, Michael, and thanks for helping us watch out for another “ministry,” Frank. I appreciate knowing the truth before I might get involved in a ministry that is hypocritical and we need people like you and Ministry Watchman to help expose those who need to repent. May the Lord purify this section of the church.
Frank, I know that you don’t need to be told, but others probably do. There’s a whole lot more to this story. There’s some history that led up to all this, or at least that’s the way it looks to me.
I’ve read a fair amount of Andrew Sandlin. Not that I agree with everything he writes but I do enjoy reading him. Well, come to think of it, I used to enjoy reading him a lot more in the past than I do today. Especially since he left Chalcedon I think his writing has really gone downhill. Anyway, back in February Andrew Sandlin wrote a brief article about R.C. Sproul, Jr’s defrockment. Sandlin’s articles are usually well thought out. But his article about Sproul’s defrockment was just pathetic and anything but well thought out.
There was a guy who posted a comment in that article, a guy who only a few people probably would have known by name on the internet back then, who posted a comment there and tactfully took Sandlin to task over his false logic (that commenter was you Frank, great comment BTW). Sandlin seems to be saying:
Sproul was a member of a Presbyterian denomination.
Sproul’s denomination exercised church discipline with him.
Being defrocked is a really bad thing for an ordained minister.
I wouldn’t mind being a member of a denomination, but I don’t ever want to be disciplined by a denomination that would hold me accountable.
Presbyterians exercise church discipline.
I’ll never be a Presbyterian.
Back on February 2nd Andy Sandlin may not have yet had an opportunity to review the case against Sproul. Since then I’m sure he has, or at least I hope he has. But it makes me wonder why he wrote such a lame article about something that he was so ignorant of, and that he admitted he was ignorant of, “I do not know whose “side” is right and whose is wrong, or if both are partly wrong.” Pathetic. Andy, why not just keep your mouth shut about it until you’ve had a chance to study the facts out for yourself? Why post anything at all if it’s just ignorant speculation?
So what are your thoughts now about Presbyterianism? I’m not talking about phony fake pretend Presbyterians like Doug Wilson. I’m asking what you think about real Presbyterians who hold their brethren accountable. I’m not talking about sissy Presbyterians, like the kind that are so common in the PCA, but real men, men like they have in the RPCGA. Sure, a real Presbyterian denomination would hold you accountable Andy if you ever started abusing your flock or stealing tax numbers or breaking your ordination vows. But real Presbyterians would also slap down a rogue like Doug Wilson in a heartbeat.
If anyone needs a good slapdown it’s Doug Wilson. Wouldn’t you agree Andy?
[…] I thought you all might like to know the Ministry Watchman’s coverage of Wilson’s latest act of tyranny: http://ministrywatchman.com/?p=47 […]
[…] I thought you all might like to know the Ministry Watchman’s coverage of Wilson’s latest act of tyranny: http://ministrywatchman.com/?p=47 […]
I do Sargent Jen. Are you in charge? The rpcga may also be ready for one SLAPP.
[…] Now that Project Pooh’s Think has reached Level Four, Doug Wilson is feeling it. How do I know? Well, Wilson is fairly predictable. Here’s his pastoral teaching for us this morning: …Let their children be orphaned, cut off without a father. Let their wives be widows, and we pray that their children would be desolate, having to beg their bread in empty places. We pray that the extortioner would come back at them, catching them in their plots, and taking all that they have. May strangers and aliens pillage them and leave them with nothing. We pray that when this happens, and Your hand is evident, that no one would show mercy, and that no kindness would be extended to his fatherless children. Cut off his posterity; may his name and his line come to nothing. Recall how sinful his father was, and call up again the sins of his mother. May their sins come before Your throne continually so that their name may be blotted out, and remembered on the earth no more.…Tie those curses around him permanently. Let this be the clothing of all our enemies. Let them curse, so long as You bless. When they get up in the morning, and hear of the blessings You have bestowed on us, let them be greatly ashamed. Let confusion cover over them completely, as though it were a mantle. I pray that You stand at our right hand, and that You would always save us from those who would condemn our souls…. […]
[…] Now that Project Pooh’s Think has reached Level Four, Doug Wilson is feeling it. How do I know? Well, Wilson is fairly predictable. Here’s his pastoral teaching for us this morning: …Let their children be orphaned, cut off without a father. Let their wives be widows, and we pray that their children would be desolate, having to beg their bread in empty places. We pray that the extortioner would come back at them, catching them in their plots, and taking all that they have. May strangers and aliens pillage them and leave them with nothing. We pray that when this happens, and Your hand is evident, that no one would show mercy, and that no kindness would be extended to his fatherless children. Cut off his posterity; may his name and his line come to nothing. Recall how sinful his father was, and call up again the sins of his mother. May their sins come before Your throne continually so that their name may be blotted out, and remembered on the earth no more.…Tie those curses around him permanently. Let this be the clothing of all our enemies. Let them curse, so long as You bless. When they get up in the morning, and hear of the blessings You have bestowed on us, let them be greatly ashamed. Let confusion cover over them completely, as though it were a mantle. I pray that You stand at our right hand, and that You would always save us from those who would condemn our souls…. […]
It would seem that there is far more to Andrew Sandlin’s departure from the CREC than meets the eye.
….Meanwhile, back at Ligonier…, RC, Tim Dick and John Dunkin are dancing around the cash register singing, “What a Friend We Have In Jesus’.
[…] Dishonest Doug Wilson, Church Splitter. "Wilson’s duplicitous and divisive behavior is reprehensible. Could it get any more despicable than for a Moderator to interpose himself in local church matters and actively encourage a church split?" Andrew Sandlin’s church concludes: "By these actions it has now become apparent that the CREC, in conflict with its constitution, has become functionally Episcopal, coalescing around Rev. Wilson as the sole denominational bishop vested with sweeping judicial and prelatical authority." Wilson is the same man who, when defrocked by his own baptist elders, pretended that the decision was "a proposal only" and immediately usurped their authority with the "cult of personality" that has enriched him ever since. "This is the very definition of a tyrant—a man who seeks to hold everyone else accountable but who for all practical purposes is accountable to no one but himself." It is no surprise, therefore, that Wilson whitewashed the RC Sproul Jr scandal. He has a soft spot in his heart for defrocked tyrants just like himself. […]
[…] Dishonest Doug Wilson, Church Splitter. "Wilson’s duplicitous and divisive behavior is reprehensible. Could it get any more despicable than for a Moderator to interpose himself in local church matters and actively encourage a church split?" Andrew Sandlin’s church concludes: "By these actions it has now become apparent that the CREC, in conflict with its constitution, has become functionally Episcopal, coalescing around Rev. Wilson as the sole denominational bishop vested with sweeping judicial and prelatical authority." Wilson is the same man who, when defrocked by his own baptist elders, pretended that the decision was "a proposal only" and immediately usurped their authority with the "cult of personality" that has enriched him ever since. "This is the very definition of a tyrant—a man who seeks to hold everyone else accountable but who for all practical purposes is accountable to no one but himself." It is no surprise, therefore, that Wilson whitewashed the RC Sproul Jr scandal. He has a soft spot in his heart for defrocked tyrants just like himself. […]
APinkFan,
As for your suggestion concerning the Ligonier Managment Team (i.e., dancing around the cash register), wouldn’t such behavior amount to idolatry and blasphemy?
Mark
Some excellent insights here from a guest contributor to Pooh’s Think. According to this author Andrew Sandlin helped feed the monster, er, the Pope, that he’d help to create. Then when the monster decided to turn on Sandlin, he decided that although it was fine for the monster to tyrannize others, Sandlin didn’t much care for the idea of being eaten himself.
[…] The elders of Christ Church generally shrug their shoulders and mutter under their breath. However, Ministry Watchman’s accurate reporting of this primary document from the COTK pricked a few responses: Csaba rebuked me and somehow confused the primary document and the Watchman’s reporting of it as my own “bitterness” that is about to “destroy me.” Mike Lawyer, Doug Wilson’s personal assistant, referred to the reporting of the primary document as “silliness.” Patch Blakey referred to this primary document and close reporting of it by the Watchman as mere “tripe and slander.” And now just this evening, I received a very strange email from Chris Witmer: From: Christopher Witmer [mailto:Christopher*** @***-sc.com] Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 7:34 PM To: ***witmer@***.net Subject: RE: Your decision to withdraw from the CREC […]
[…] The elders of Christ Church generally shrug their shoulders and mutter under their breath. However, Ministry Watchman’s accurate reporting of this primary document from the COTK pricked a few responses: Csaba rebuked me and somehow confused the primary document and the Watchman’s reporting of it as my own “bitterness” that is about to “destroy me.” Mike Lawyer, Doug Wilson’s personal assistant, referred to the reporting of the primary document as “silliness.” Patch Blakey referred to this primary document and close reporting of it by the Watchman as mere “tripe and slander.” And now just this evening, I received a very strange email from Chris Witmer: From: Christopher Witmer [mailto:Christopher*** @***-sc.com] Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 7:34 PM To: ***witmer@***.net Subject: RE: Your decision to withdraw from the CREC […]